| 繁體中文 | English
首页 | 学术期刊 | 学位论文 | 学术会议 | 中外专利 | 中外标准 | 科技成果 | 新方志 | 法律法规 | 专题
浏览历史
首页 > NSTL期刊 > 其它
Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) are the cornerstone of treatment of type-2 diabetes and as 70% of type-2 diabetics succumb to a cardiovascular disease,1 the key issue in the selection of an OHA, besides glycemic control, is also its potential to modify cardiovascular risk and atherosclerosis. Looking at the colossal figure of 30 million diabetics in the Indian context, the issue of selection of OHA has wide spread implications. Among the OHAs, the sulfonylureas (SUs) have the potential to blunt ischemic preconditioning (IP) which has an adverse effect on cardiovascular events. The biguanides, besides preserving [3 cell function also reduces macrovascular events but suffer from the drawback of inducing lactic acidosis. The glitazones on one hand decrease macrovascular events, but on the other hand, produce fluid overload and precipitate heart failure. Thus the commonly used OHA have the potential to affect cardiovascular profile favorably or adversely. The cardiovascular concerns of OHA are outlined in Table 1. There remain five classes of oral hypoglycemic agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)2 (Table 2).